Looking for help in your family court proceedings?Bridge The Gap is a free, community-built guide to UK family court, written by litigants and McKenzie Friends, for litigants. Real observations, plain English, and people who can help..
The court's formal decision after considering the evidence and submissions. In family proceedings a judgment sets out what the court has decided and the reasons for it. A judgment may be given orally in court (ex tempore) or reserved and handed down later in writing. It is distinct from the order that follows — the judgment is the court's reasoning and conclusion, while the order is the formal document that puts the decision into effect.
In Plain English
The judge's decision and the reasons for it, given either spoken in court or in a written document.
This content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
A "gap" is a common assumption people hold going into family court, set against what the court actually does. The bold line below is the assumption — not a fact. The reality underneath is what the court typically observes.
Gap #593
The assumption
If the other parent reports a new allegation at a different police station, a magistrate can immediately overrule the family court's contact order.
The reality
Reporting an allegation to the police, at any station, does not change a child arrangements order. The order stays in force until the family court varies or discharges it on an application under the Children Act 1989. When contact stops after a new allegation, it is usually because one of these separate steps has been taken. Bail conditions. Where someone is arrested, bail can carry conditions, and those can restrict contact with a child. In Nottinghamshire County Council v The Mother (Police Bail) [2024] EWHC 666 (Fam), which was a care case, police bail conditions prevented unsupervised contact with any child and left no room for the family court to allow it. Mrs Justice Lieven said it is not for the family court to dictate bail conditions to the police, but that the family judge was much better placed than the police to assess the risk to the child, and that she hoped the police would consider the role of the family court when setting bail conditions. The judgment records that an application to vary police bail conditions can be made to the magistrates' court. A Domestic Abuse Protection Order. The police can apply for a DAPO by complaint to a magistrates' court (section 28 of the Domestic Abuse Act 2021). Practice Direction 36ZG notes that, under section 36(1), the requirements of a DAPO must so far as practicable avoid conflict with any other court order or injunction the person is subject to, as well as conflict with their religious beliefs and interference with their work or with their attendance at an educational establishment. An application to vary or discharge a DAPO goes to the court that made it. A new family court order. A parent can apply to the family court to vary the child arrangements order, or for a protective order such as a non-molestation order. The police do not pass a new allegation to the family court automatically. Under the Disclosure of Information between Family and Criminal Agencies and Jurisdictions: 2024 Protocol, which replaced the 2013 Protocol and the old Annex H order template, police material is requested using the protocol's own forms. In private law proceedings the request goes to the police on the Annex 1 form, accompanied by an order in the court's standard form at Annex 5. The protocol states that use of its annexed forms is mandatory, and Annex 2 is the guidance written for completing Annex 1 in private law proceedings. Requests are expected to be focused and proportionate rather than a blanket trawl, and the guidance contemplates a 20-day timescale for the police response. In practice the court usually directs this where a fact-finding hearing is contemplated; where no direction has been made, the litigant in person has to ask the court to make the order. The DAPO rules send information the other way: when a family court makes a DAPO, the court officer emails a copy to the police within one day (Practice Direction 36ZG, paragraph 20). This part of the law is in transition. DAPOs have run in pilot areas only since 27 November 2024. The pilot ends on 24 November 2026, and from 25 November 2026 DAPOs are due to be available across all court jurisdictions in England and Wales, with Practice Direction 36ZG amended rather than replaced. Check the current position before relying on this after that date. Each of these is changed in a different place, so it matters which one has actually been made. This is general information, not legal advice.
Gap #446
The assumption
(Publication) Once it's published, I can share it and say who it's about.
The reality
Identifying anyone in an anonymised judgment, on social media or anywhere else, is contempt of court. This applies to the parents and their families as well as the public.
Gap #444
The assumption
(Publication) I'll get to see and approve the anonymised version before it's published.
The reality
The level of anonymisation is a decision for the judge after hearing the parties' views. In a 2024 family court case, a request to review the anonymised draft was refused as unnecessary.
Gap #443
The assumption
(Publication) My only option is to oppose publication outright.
The reality
Concerns about being recognised usually go to how much detail is removed, not whether the judgment is published. In a 2024 family court case, a parent's specific requests about anonymisation were all accepted, even though the objection to publication itself failed.
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you understand terms like these in the context of your case.
Find your supportWe use essential cookies to stay signed in and remember this choice. With your permission we also use Google Analytics to see which pages help people most. Privacy Policy