UK Family Court·Insights for litigants in person
Gap 446

Assumption: "(Publication) Once it's published, I can share it and say who it's about."

1 min read

This content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.

What People Expect

People think a published judgment is free to share with names attached.

Court Reality

Identifying anyone in an anonymised judgment, on social media or anywhere else, is contempt of court. This applies to the parents and their families as well as the public.

Share this gap

Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.

Bridge The Gap

The Gap?

"(Publication) Once it's published, I can share it and say who it's about."

Court Reality

Identifying anyone in an anonymised judgment, on social media or anywhere else, is contempt of court. This applies to the parents and their families as well as the public.

Experienced a gap between what you thought you knew about family court and the reality? Share your own and get credited.

familycourtbridge.org

Published26 September 2026Last reviewed26 September 2026

Navigating court alone?

A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.

Find your support

Cookie Consent

We use essential cookies only to provide you with the best experience on our website. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.