Looking for help in your family court proceedings?Bridge The Gap is a free, community-built guide to UK family court, written by litigants and McKenzie Friends, for litigants. Real observations, plain English, and people who can help..
A challenge to a court decision, asking a higher court to change or set aside the judgment or order. In family proceedings an appeal is not a re-hearing — the appeal court looks at whether the first court made an error of law, misapplied the law to the facts, or reached a decision that was plainly wrong. Permission to appeal is usually required. An appeal is distinct from a variation (which changes an order because circumstances have changed) and from the slip rule (which only corrects a clerical mistake).
In Plain English
Asking a higher court to review and change a decision because the first court got the law or the facts wrong. You usually need permission, and it's not just a second chance to argue your case.
This content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
A "gap" is a common assumption people hold going into family court, set against what the court actually does. The bold line below is the assumption — not a fact. The reality underneath is what the court typically observes.
Gap #528
The assumption
Court welfare officers come to your case with an open mind and assess it on its merits.
The reality
One parent's account: welfare officers seemed to have decided the outcome from the start. After an appeal was upheld, the replacement officers made clear there would be consequences for challenging them. This is one person's experience, not proof of a universal pattern — but it reflects a real perception among many litigants that welfare officers arrive with their conclusion already formed.
Gap #471
The assumption
(Appeals) The judge ordered unsupervised contact, so that is settled.
The reality
The other parent can seek permission to appeal. If the appeal succeeds, the appeal court can make a new decision itself rather than sending the case back, where it has enough evidence. In a recent appeal, a stepped plan to unsupervised contact was replaced with monthly supervised contact.
Gap #468
The assumption
(Domestic Abuse Findings) If the judge thinks I came across well in court, the contact decision is safe.
The reality
Where domestic abuse has been proved, the judge must work through PD12J paragraphs 35 to 40, apply the welfare checklist in light of the findings, and explain why the order will not expose the child to harm. A decision based mainly on how a parent presented in court, without that analysis, can be overturned on appeal.
Gap #466
The assumption
(Domestic Abuse Findings) How I speak to solicitors, Cafcass or contact centre staff has nothing to do with contact.
The reality
Where domestic abuse has been found, PD12J paragraph 37 asks the court to consider how the parent is likely to behave during contact and whether they are using the process to continue abuse. Abusive emails, swearing at staff and threatening language are evidence the court can use to answer those questions. In a recent appeal, this conduct was a central reason contact stayed supervised.
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you understand terms like these in the context of your case.
Find your supportWe use essential cookies to stay signed in and remember this choice. With your permission we also use Google Analytics to see which pages help people most. Privacy Policy