Looking for help in your family court proceedings?Bridge The Gap is a free, community-built guide to UK family court, written by litigants and McKenzie Friends, for litigants. Real observations, plain English, and people who can help.
This content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
That the court applies the same standards to both parents — that if one parent breaches an order or blocks contact, the court responds the same way regardless of which parent it is.
One parent's account: the other parent blocked access and the court supported them, while this parent — the one trying to maintain contact — ended up with a ban on reapplying. This is one person's experience, not proof of systemic bias — but it reflects a perception many parents hold that the system holds them and the other parent to different standards.
This insight was contributed by someone who has been through the family court system. Bridge The Gap is deeply grateful to everyone who shares their experience — your honesty helps bridge the gap for the next person still in it.
Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.

Bridge The Gap
The other parent broke the order. This parent got the ban.
The court treats both parents equally when one breaches an order.
Reality
One parent's account: the other parent blocked access and the court supported them, while this parent — the one trying to maintain contact — ended up with a ban on reapplying.
familycourtbridge.org • #bridgethegap
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.
Find your supportWe use essential cookies to keep you signed in and remember this choice. If you allow it, we also use Google Analytics to learn which pages help people most. Read our Privacy Policy.