This content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
People assume the name on an account, property or investment decides who it belongs to when the marriage ends.
The court looks at why an asset was put in someone's name and how it was used afterwards, not just whose name is on it. In RRE v JPR [2026] EWFC 7, most of the wealth was held in the wife's name for tax planning reasons, but the court treated it as coming from the husband's pre-marriage wealth rather than as shared.
Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.
The Gap?
"(Assets in One Name) If it's in my name, it's mine."
Court Reality
The court looks at why an asset was put in someone's name and how it was used afterwards, not just whose name is on it. In RRE v JPR [2026] EWFC 7, most of the wealth was held in the wife's name for tax planning reasons, but the court treated it as coming from the husband's pre-marriage wealth rather than as shared.
Experienced a gap between what you thought you knew about family court and the reality? Share your own and get credited.
familycourtbridge.org
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.
Find your supportWe use essential cookies only to provide you with the best experience on our website. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.