This content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
Financial questionnaires from the other side are optional requests that you can choose not to answer.
In Doweck v Doweck [2026] EWFC 238, the husband was found in breach of a court order to reply to a questionnaire. The wife applied to commit him for contempt. Court-ordered questionnaires are not optional — they are a core part of financial disclosure. Refusing to answer can lead to a committal application, cost orders, and adverse inferences drawn against you by the judge.
Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.
The Gap?
"I do not have to answer my ex questionnaire in financial proceedings — it is just their fishing expedition and I can ignore it."
Court Reality
In Doweck v Doweck [2026] EWFC 238, the husband was found in breach of a court order to reply to a questionnaire. The wife applied to commit him for contempt. Court-ordered questionnaires are not optional — they are a core part of financial disclosure. Refusing to answer can lead to a committal application, cost orders, and adverse inferences drawn against you by the judge.
Experienced a gap between what you thought you knew about family court and the reality? Share your own and get credited.
familycourtbridge.org
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.
Find your supportWe use essential cookies only to provide you with the best experience on our website. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.