Assumption: "I can come to an FDR without having made any without prejudice proposals."
1 min readThis content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
Court Reality
At a Financial Dispute Resolution (FDR) appointment, the court expects both parties to have engaged meaningfully, including making without prejudice proposals. Failure to do so can lead to criticism and potential costs orders. (Family Procedure Rules Part 9)
This insight was contributed by someone who has been through the family court system. Bridge The Gap is deeply grateful to everyone who shares their experience — your honesty helps bridge the gap for the next person still in it.
Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.
The Gap?
"I can come to an FDR without having made any without prejudice proposals."
Court Reality
At a Financial Dispute Resolution (FDR) appointment, the court expects both parties to have engaged meaningfully, including making without prejudice proposals. Failure to do so can lead to criticism and potential costs orders. (Family Procedure Rules Part 9)
Experienced a gap between what you thought you knew about family court and the reality? Share your own and get credited.
familycourtbridge.org
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.
Find your supportCookie Consent
We use essential cookies only to provide you with the best experience on our website. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.