The law says both parents have a right to see their child — the court can't just refuse contact.
1 min readThis content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
What People Expect
The presumption of parental involvement is a guarantee of contact.
Court Reality
Section 1(2A) of the Children Act 1989 presumes that involvement of both parents is beneficial — it does NOT create a right to contact. The court can restrict, supervise, or refuse contact entirely where welfare demands it. PD12J requires the court to consider harm and domestic abuse before making any child arrangements order. The presumption is a starting point — not a conclusion.
Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.
The Gap?
"The law says both parents have a right to see their child — the court can't just refuse contact."
Court Reality
Section 1(2A) of the Children Act 1989 presumes that involvement of both parents is beneficial — it does NOT create a right to contact. The court can restrict, supervise, or refuse contact entirely where welfare demands it. PD12J requires the court to consider harm and domestic abuse before making any child arrangements order. The presumption is a starting point — not a conclusion.
Experienced a gap between what you thought you knew about family court and the reality? Share your own and get credited.
familycourtbridge.org
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.
Find your supportCookie Consent
We use essential cookies only to provide you with the best experience on our website. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.