The court has appointed a psychologist to assess my family. They must be qualified.
1 min readThis content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
What People Expect
Litigants assume that because the court appointed an expert, that expert must have proper qualifications and credentials.
Court Reality
Until February 2026, anyone could call themselves a psychologist and give expert evidence in family court. The President of the Family Division has now issued firm guidance that unregulated psychologists should not be used unless there is no alternative. Courts still have discretion — but must now explain their reasoning in writing.
Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.
The Gap?
"The court has appointed a psychologist to assess my family. They must be qualified."
Court Reality
Until February 2026, anyone could call themselves a psychologist and give expert evidence in family court. The President of the Family Division has now issued firm guidance that unregulated psychologists should not be used unless there is no alternative. Courts still have discretion — but must now explain their reasoning in writing.
Experienced a gap between what you thought you knew about family court and the reality? Share your own and get credited.
familycourtbridge.org
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.
Find your supportCookie Consent
We use essential cookies only to provide you with the best experience on our website. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.