Looking for help in your family court proceedings?Bridge The Gap is a free, community-built guide to UK family court.

People & Roles

Respondent

1 min read

The person responding to a court application made by someone else. For example, if your ex applies for a child arrangements order, you're the respondent in that case.

In Plain English

The person who is responding to a legal case started by someone else. For example, if your ex-partner applies for a court order, you are the respondent.

Related terms

Related pages on Bridge The Gap

  • UK Family Court
  • Your Journey

This content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.

See this term in a real gap

A "gap" is a common assumption people hold going into family court, set against what the court actually does. The bold line below is the assumption — not a fact. The reality underneath is what the court typically observes.

Gap #517

The assumption

As the respondent, I will be told straight away when my spouse applies for the conditional order, and I will get an email at every stage.

The reality

What you receive depends on how the divorce application was made, whether it was online or by post, and on whether the court service holds your email address. GOV.UK says the court reviews the application for a conditional order, which can take several weeks. If the judge agrees, the court sends both spouses a certificate giving the time and date the conditional order will be granted. The published guidance does not describe a separate notice to the respondent at the moment of application, so some respondents may first hear at the certificate stage. One respondent told us they received emails and had to agree to every step by following the links sent. That is one person's experience, not a description of the official process. If you applied by post or the court has no email address for you, you may be contacted differently. If you were a respondent, which emails or letters did you receive, and at what stage? This is a community question, so please share only what happened to you and leave out names and personal details.

Gap #515

The assumption

My pension counts towards the £250,000 limit for the Express Financial Remedy pilot.

The reality

In the Express Financial Remedy pilot (PD36ZH), pension rights and Pension Protection Fund compensation entitlement are excluded from the £250,000 figure. "Total combined net assets" is the combined value of the applicant's and respondent's assets, after deducting liabilities and mortgages. A case with large pensions can still be inside the pilot if the rest falls under the limit.

Gap #513

The assumption

If the applicant says the assets are under £250,000, the Express Financial Remedy pilot applies and that is the end of it.

The reality

Under the Express Financial Remedy pilot (PD36ZH), the asset limit is that combined net assets are, or are considered by the applicant as likely to be, less than £250,000. That is the applicant's estimate. Either party can apply for a direction that the standard procedure applies instead. The application must give reasons and be filed and served as soon as possible, and generally no later than 7 days after the exchange of financial statements. The court looks at complex assets or income, other complex issues, an unviable first hearing, or a final hearing likely to need more than a day.

Gap #97

The assumption

I am being dragged to court to have my character defiled. I am the one being bullied here. My refusal to engage is self-defence.

The reality

A respondent's refusal to engage often leads to serious consequences. The applicant may have no choice but to go to court if the respondent won't participate. Under FPR 2010 Part 28.1 and the Senior Courts Act 1981 s.51, the court can order the non-engaging party to pay costs. The court may also draw adverse inferences from non-engagement, which can affect the outcome of the case.

Published19 August 2026Last reviewed23 September 2026

Navigating court alone?

A McKenzie Friend can help you understand terms like these in the context of your case.

Find your support

Please note

Please note: Nothing on this website constitutes legal advice and we are not liable for any reliance on the information provided. Family court rules and procedures can change, and whilst this was correct at the time of writing, circumstances may have changed since publication. For up-to-date guidance, please refer to Gov.uk or consult a qualified legal professional.

Join our newsletter

Community insights and new guides from Bridge The Gap, sent to your inbox. No spam, unsubscribe any time.

Bridge The Gap

Family Court Reality: empowering UK litigants in person with the insight and resources to navigate the justice system with confidence.

For McKenzie Friends

If you'd like to be featured on Bridge The Gap, we'd love to hear from you.

Get In TouchWhy join Bridge The Gap?

Press & Media

Media enquiries and press releases about Bridge The Gap.

Press Enquiry

Key External Resources

Disclosure: Divorce Navigator (divorcenavigator.uk) is a separate service run by the same team as Bridge The Gap. We list it because we believe it is useful, not because we receive a fee.

Intellectual Property: All content on this website — the "Bridge The Gap" name and concept, gap analyses, case journey structures — is the intellectual property of Bridge The Gap and its creator. © 2026 Bridge The Gap. All rights reserved. Unauthorised reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of any content is strictly prohibited without prior written permission.

Bridge The Gap provides observational insights and collective community experiences only. We do not provide legal advice, legal representation, or caseworker services. Always consult a qualified legal professional for your specific circumstances.

Bridge The Gap is run by Libra Consultants, which operates this website.

No endorsement: Inclusion of a McKenzie Friend or business on Bridge The Gap is not an endorsement, recommendation or verification of that person, their services or their qualifications. Nobody is ranked or evaluated here. Explore, ask questions and make your own decisions by dealing directly with each person you choose to contact.

Made with for litigants in person•Privacy Policy••

Website byThe Back Office — Bookkeeping & Web Design

We use essential cookies to stay signed in and remember this choice. With your permission we also use Google Analytics to see which pages help people most. Privacy Policy