Looking for help in your family court proceedings?Bridge The Gap is a free, community-built guide to UK family court, written by litigants and McKenzie Friends, for litigants. Real observations, plain English, and people who can help..
The process of making someone comply with a court order when they haven't done so voluntarily. Enforcement can take several forms depending on the order — for example, an enforcement order, a warrant of arrest or delivery, an attachment of earnings (taking money direct from wages to pay maintenance), a charging order over property, or, in serious cases, committal for contempt. It's how the court ensures its orders are actually followed rather than ignored.
In Plain English
The steps taken by the court to force someone to follow an order they are currently ignoring. This can include taking money from their wages or, in very serious cases, the threat of prison.
This content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
A "gap" is a common assumption people hold going into family court, set against what the court actually does. The bold line below is the assumption — not a fact. The reality underneath is what the court typically observes.
Gap #544
The assumption
Enforcing the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) increase you're owed gives the other side grounds to apply to reduce your maintenance.
The reality
Asking the payer to comply with an existing order is not conduct that justifies a variation, and it does not create new grounds for one. A variation application requires a change of circumstances since the order was made — not the fact that you enforced it. Retaliatory applications happen, but enforcement itself is not a trigger the court recognises. Keep your request factual, in writing, and keep copies.
Gap #530
The assumption
If you have a court order, the court will enforce it when the other parent breaches it.
The reality
One parent's account: they had a court order, the other parent blocked access, and the court supported them. They went through years of hearings trying to enforce it and ended up with nothing. This is one person's experience — but it reflects a widely held observation that enforcement of child arrangements orders is one of the system's weakest points.
Gap #579
The assumption
An English order will still protect the child if they are taken abroad.
The reality
Some countries do not recognise English orders automatically. Where the country is not a party to the 1980 Hague Convention, enforcement can be uncertain and may need separate proceedings there. The court looks at the risk of non-return and what safeguards exist before allowing travel or relocation.
Gap #575
The assumption
Where you divorce is just an administrative detail — what really matters is where you married.
The reality
The country where your divorce is processed is one of the most financially consequential decisions in the entire process — not a neutral administrative detail. What matters far more than where you married is where you are habitually resident now. If England and Wales is your genuine home, you can usually divorce here regardless of where you married. England applies section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, which considers needs, resources, and contributions (including non-financial ones like raising children). Many European jurisdictions take a narrower approach, treating pre-marital or inherited assets as separate property. Post-Brexit, jurisdiction and enforcement across EU countries is less predictable than it was. Getting this wrong can cost tens of thousands of pounds — and by the time proceedings are underway, it is often too late to change direction.
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you understand terms like these in the context of your case.
Find your supportWe use essential cookies to stay signed in and remember this choice. With your permission we also use Google Analytics to see which pages help people most. Privacy Policy