Assumption: "The court order says we use a co-parenting app. It used to be free. Now they are refusing to pay for it and I cannot enforce communication."
1 min readThis content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
What People Expect
If the named app in a court order is no longer free and one party refuses to pay, the order has been breached and there is nothing that can be done — or alternatively, the refusing party must comply with the original app regardless of cost.
Court Reality
Court orders may specify a communication method, but they cannot ensure the app remains free. When an app moves behind a paywall and one party refuses to pay, this often leads to impracticality in the order. Observations suggest that varying the order could help specify a free or mutually agreed alternative.
Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.
The Gap?
"The court order says we use a co-parenting app. It used to be free. Now they are refusing to pay for it and I cannot enforce communication."
Court Reality
Court orders may specify a communication method, but they cannot ensure the app remains free. When an app moves behind a paywall and one party refuses to pay, this often leads to impracticality in the order.
Seen a gap between what you thought and the reality? Share yours.
familycourtbridge.org
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.
Find your supportCookie Consent
We use essential cookies only, such as remembering this choice and keeping you signed in if you create an account. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.