UK Family Court·Insights for litigants in person
Family Court Reality (the gap) · 503

Assumption: "Indirect contact such as letters, calls or recordings is always a safe way to stay in touch."

1 min read

This content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.

What People Expect

Indirect contact is often seen as a low-risk option that courts will always allow.

Court Reality

Courts weigh the safety and wellbeing of the child and of the parent they live with. Where domestic abuse has been found or admitted, a court may decide that indirect contact is not safe or appropriate, including where it could re-traumatise the protective parent. This is a discretionary decision based on the facts.

Share this insight

Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.

Bridge The Gap

The Gap?

"Indirect contact such as letters, calls or recordings is always a safe way to stay in touch."

Court Reality

Courts weigh the safety and wellbeing of the child and of the parent they live with.

Seen a gap between what you thought and the reality? Share yours.

familycourtbridge.org

Published9 October 2026Last reviewed9 October 2026

Navigating court alone?

A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.

Find your support

Cookie Consent

We use essential cookies only, such as remembering this choice and keeping you signed in if you create an account. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.