UK Family Court·Insights for litigants in person
Family Court Reality (the gap) · 446

Assumption: "(Publication) Once it's published, I can share it and say who it's about."

1 min read

This content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.

What People Expect

People think a published judgment is free to share with names attached.

Court Reality

Identifying anyone in an anonymised judgment, on social media or anywhere else, is contempt of court. This applies to the parents and their families as well as the public.

Share this insight

Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.

Bridge The Gap

The Gap?

"(Publication) Once it's published, I can share it and say who it's about."

Court Reality

Identifying anyone in an anonymised judgment, on social media or anywhere else, is contempt of court. This applies to the parents and their families as well as the public.

Seen a gap between what you thought and the reality? Share yours.

familycourtbridge.org

Published26 September 2026Last reviewed8 October 2026

Navigating court alone?

A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.

Find your support

Cookie Consent

We use essential cookies only, such as remembering this choice and keeping you signed in if you create an account. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.