This content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
People assume the child's welfare automatically outweighs publication.
The child's welfare is a primary consideration when deciding publication, but it is not the paramount one. In a 2024 family court case, the judge found the risk to a young child was remote, because they were unlikely to come across the judgment for many years and anonymisation made it very unlikely they could identify themselves.
Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.

The Gap?
"(Publication) Publishing a judgment about my child will harm them."
Court Reality
The child's welfare is a primary consideration when deciding publication, but it is not the paramount one.
Seen a gap between what you thought and the reality? Share yours.
familycourtbridge.org
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.
Find your supportWe use essential cookies only, such as remembering this choice and keeping you signed in if you create an account. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.