UK Family Court·Insights for litigants in person
Family Court Reality (the gap) · 420

Assumption: "(Assets in One Name) If it's in my name, it's mine."

1 min read

This content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.

What People Expect

People assume the name on an account, property or investment decides who it belongs to when the marriage ends.

Court Reality

The court looks at why an asset was put in someone's name and how it was used afterwards, not just whose name is on it. In RRE v JPR [2026] EWFC 7, most of the wealth was held in the wife's name for tax planning reasons, but the court treated it as coming from the husband's pre-marriage wealth rather than as shared.

Share this insight

Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.

Bridge The Gap

The Gap?

"(Assets in One Name) If it's in my name, it's mine."

Court Reality

The court looks at why an asset was put in someone's name and how it was used afterwards, not just whose name is on it.

Seen a gap between what you thought and the reality? Share yours.

familycourtbridge.org

Published24 September 2026Last reviewed8 October 2026

Navigating court alone?

A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.

Find your support

Cookie Consent

We use essential cookies only, such as remembering this choice and keeping you signed in if you create an account. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.