This content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
A parent may think that a judge's decision not to hold a fact-finding hearing is something an appeal court will readily revisit if they disagree with it.
Whether to hold a fact-finding hearing is a case management decision, and appeal courts are especially reluctant to interfere with those. The bar is that the decision was plainly wrong, not merely arguably wrong, and a judge who has heard the case across many hearings is given even more latitude by an appeal court.
Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.

The Gap?
"A judge's decision not to hold a fact-finding hearing is something an appeal court will readily revisit if I disagree."
Court Reality
Whether to hold a fact-finding hearing is a case management decision, and appeal courts are especially reluctant to interfere with those.
Seen a gap between what you thought and the reality? Share yours.
familycourtbridge.org
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.
Find your supportWe use essential cookies only, such as remembering this choice and keeping you signed in if you create an account. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.