Assumption: "If proceedings have already run for years, a judge who knows the case well should keep hearing it, even if things go wrong procedurally."
1 min readThis content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
What People Expect
A parent may assume that once proceedings have run for years, the judge who knows the case well should keep hearing it, even if something goes wrong procedurally along the way.
Court Reality
Serious procedural unfairness can lead an appeal court to reallocate a long-running case to a different judge entirely, even where this breaks judicial continuity built up over several years, particularly where the relationship between the court and a party or professional involved has been damaged.
Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.
The Gap?
"If proceedings have already run for years, a judge who knows the case well should keep hearing it, even if things go wrong procedurally."
Court Reality
Serious procedural unfairness can lead an appeal court to reallocate a long-running case to a different judge entirely, even where this breaks judicial continuity built up over several years, particularly where the relationship between...
Seen a gap between what you thought and the reality? Share yours.
familycourtbridge.org
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.
Find your supportCookie Consent
We use essential cookies only, such as remembering this choice and keeping you signed in if you create an account. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.