This content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
Litigants in person often believe that telling the court about their ex's bad conduct — how they were wronged, how the other side behaved — will persuade the judge to adjust the financial settlement in their favour.
The court only takes conduct into account where it would be 'inequitable to disregard' — a high threshold that most ordinary misconduct does not meet. In Gray v Gray [2023] EWFC 349 (B), a self-represented husband pursued a conduct case that failed entirely, and was ordered to pay 75% of his wife's legal costs. Pursuing conduct allegations that don't meet the threshold doesn't just fail to help — it can saddle you with a substantial costs order against you.
Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.

The Gap?
"Making conduct allegations in financial remedy proceedings will always help my case."
Court Reality
The court only takes conduct into account where it would be 'inequitable to disregard' — a high threshold that most ordinary misconduct does not meet.
Seen a gap between what you thought and the reality? Share yours.
familycourtbridge.org
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.
Find your supportWe use essential cookies only, such as remembering this choice and keeping you signed in if you create an account. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.