Assumption: "If my account has any inconsistencies, the judge won't believe me and my case is over."
1 min readThis content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
What People Expect
Many litigants panic that a single inconsistency — a detail they didn't mention to the police at the time, or a slightly different recollection later — will destroy their credibility and mean the court rejects everything they say.
Court Reality
Inconsistency is not automatically fatal. The court is required to consider that victims of abuse react in different ways, and that an account being less complete to the police at the time doesn't automatically mean it's untrue later. However, inconsistency does matter: where an account to the police differs materially from later evidence — particularly on serious allegations — the court may find that specific allegation undermined. The key is that each allegation is weighed individually, not that one inconsistency sinks the whole case. (Re C [2026] EWFC 74 (B))
Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.
The Gap?
"If my account has any inconsistencies, the judge won't believe me and my case is over."
Court Reality
Inconsistency is not automatically fatal. The court is required to consider that victims of abuse react in different ways, and that an account being less complete to the police at the time doesn't automatically mean it's untrue later.
Seen a gap between what you thought and the reality? Share yours.
familycourtbridge.org
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.
Find your supportCookie Consent
We use essential cookies only, such as remembering this choice and keeping you signed in if you create an account. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.