Looking for help in your family court proceedings?Bridge The Gap is a free, community-built guide to UK family court, written by litigants and McKenzie Friends, for litigants. Real observations, plain English, and people who can help.
This content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
Unmarried couples who buy a property jointly often assume that whoever put in more money, whether for the deposit or the mortgage, will get more back when the relationship ends.
Where a property is bought in joint names with no declaration of trust, the law presumes you own it equally, regardless of unequal financial contributions. That presumption is a high bar to overturn. It takes clear evidence of a different agreement, or of a shared intention that changed later, to get anything other than a 50/50 split.
This insight was contributed by someone who has been through the family court system. Bridge The Gap is deeply grateful to everyone who shares their experience — your honesty helps bridge the gap for the next person still in it.
Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.

The Gap?
"If we own the house jointly, whoever paid more of the deposit or mortgage gets a bigger share when we split up."
Court Reality
Where a property is bought in joint names with no declaration of trust, the law presumes you own it equally, regardless of unequal financial contributions. That presumption is a high bar to overturn.
Seen a gap between what you thought and the reality? Share yours.
familycourtbridge.org
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.
Find your supportWe use essential cookies only, such as remembering this choice and keeping you signed in if you create an account. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Read our Privacy Policy.