Assumption: "I've put money or work into my partner's house, so I'm automatically entitled to a share of it."
1 min readThis content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
What People Expect
A partner who puts money, labour, or renovation work into a home owned solely by the other person often assumes this creates an automatic right to a share of it.
Court Reality
Where a property is owned in one person's sole name, contributing money or work doesn't create a share on its own. You need to show either a financial contribution to the purchase or mortgage, or an agreement or understanding that you'd have a share, combined with acting to your detriment in reliance on it. Renovation work or general household spending, without more, has been found not to be enough.
This insight was contributed by someone who has been through the family court system. Bridge The Gap is deeply grateful to everyone who shares their experience — your honesty helps bridge the gap for the next person still in it.
Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.
The Gap?
"I've put money or work into my partner's house, so I'm automatically entitled to a share of it."
Court Reality
Where a property is owned in one person's sole name, contributing money or work doesn't create a share on its own.
Seen a gap between what you thought and the reality? Share yours.
familycourtbridge.org
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.
Find your supportCookie Consent
We use essential cookies only, such as remembering this choice and keeping you signed in if you create an account. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.