Assumption: "We have children together, so I'm automatically entitled to stay in the house, or my ex is automatically entitled to a share of it."
1 min readThis content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
What People Expect
Unmarried parents sometimes assume that having children together automatically protects their right to stay in the home, or gives the other parent a share of a property they don't legally own.
Court Reality
Having a child together doesn't itself create an ownership share. It can support a separate claim under Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989, for example for a property to be provided or a lump sum paid for the child's benefit, but these claims are for the child, not the parent, are fact specific, and any property provided this way is typically returned when the child turns 18 or finishes secondary education.
This insight was contributed by someone who has been through the family court system. Bridge The Gap is deeply grateful to everyone who shares their experience — your honesty helps bridge the gap for the next person still in it.
Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.
The Gap?
"We have children together, so I'm automatically entitled to stay in the house, or my ex is automatically entitled to a share of it."
Court Reality
Having a child together doesn't itself create an ownership share.
Seen a gap between what you thought and the reality? Share yours.
familycourtbridge.org
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.
Find your supportCookie Consent
We use essential cookies only, such as remembering this choice and keeping you signed in if you create an account. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.