Assumption: "I cannot be ordered to pay costs in children proceedings — that only happens in financial cases."
1 min readThis content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
What People Expect
Costs orders are only made in financial proceedings, not in children cases where each party always bears their own costs.
Court Reality
Costs orders in children proceedings are exceptional but real. In Mahmoud v Glanville, a mother who abducted her child, breached orders repeatedly, and made unfounded allegations was ordered to pay 95000 plus 20000 pro bono costs. The Court of Appeal in E (Children: Costs) ordered 50 percent of costs after unsubstantiated sexual abuse allegations. The threshold is high but deliberate obstruction and unfounded allegations can trigger tens of thousands in costs.
Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.
The Gap?
"I cannot be ordered to pay costs in children proceedings — that only happens in financial cases."
Court Reality
Costs orders in children proceedings are exceptional but real. In Mahmoud v Glanville, a mother who abducted her child, breached orders repeatedly, and made unfounded allegations was ordered to pay 95000 plus 20000 pro bono costs.
Seen a gap between what you thought and the reality? Share yours.
familycourtbridge.org
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.
Find your supportCookie Consent
We use essential cookies only, such as remembering this choice and keeping you signed in if you create an account. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.