This content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
Contact is determined by the child's welfare, not the outcome of fact-finding alone. Even where no findings are made, the court must still assess whether contact is safe and in the child's best interests before ordering it — there is no automatic entitlement. (Children Act 1989, s.1)
This insight was contributed by someone who has been through the family court system. Bridge The Gap is deeply grateful to everyone who shares their experience — your honesty helps bridge the gap for the next person still in it.
Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.

The Gap?
"If no findings of fact are found, I will automatically be allowed to start seeing the children."
Court Reality
Contact is determined by the child's welfare, not the outcome of fact-finding alone.
Seen a gap between what you thought and the reality? Share yours.
familycourtbridge.org
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.
Find your supportWe use essential cookies only, such as remembering this choice and keeping you signed in if you create an account. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.