Assumption: "If I can prove the other parent is failing, the court will rule in my favour."
1 min readThis content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
What People Expect
Litigants believe the court will declare a winner based on which parent can demonstrate the other is the worse carer.
Court Reality
The court does not judge which parent is better. It applies the welfare checklist under s.1 Children Act 1989 — the child's welfare is the only consideration. Even where concerns about the other parent are upheld, the outcome is almost always a co-parenting arrangement, not a decision that one parent wins and the other loses. If you go in expecting a verdict on the other parent's failings, you will be unprepared for what the court actually does.
Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.
The Gap?
"If I can prove the other parent is failing, the court will rule in my favour."
Court Reality
The court does not judge which parent is better. 1 Children Act 1989 — the child's welfare is the only consideration.
Seen a gap between what you thought and the reality? Share yours.
familycourtbridge.org
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.
Find your supportCookie Consent
We use essential cookies only, such as remembering this choice and keeping you signed in if you create an account. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.