UK Family Court·Insights for litigants in person
Gap 507

Assumption: "A section 91(14) order is a permanent ban on court applications."

1 min read

This content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.

What People Expect

People often think this order stops them from ever going back to court about the child.

Court Reality

A section 91(14) order does not ban applications permanently. It means a person needs the court's permission before making certain applications. The court decides whether to make the order and how long it lasts, and the length must be proportionate to the harm it is meant to prevent. The length is discretionary and varies between cases.

Share this gap

Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.

Bridge The Gap

The Gap?

"A section 91(14) order is a permanent ban on court applications."

Court Reality

A section 91(14) order does not ban applications permanently. It means a person needs the court's permission before making certain applications. The court decides whether to make the order and how long it lasts, and the length must be proportionate to the harm it is meant to prevent. The length is discretionary and varies between cases.

Experienced a gap between what you thought you knew about family court and the reality? Share your own and get credited.

familycourtbridge.org

Published9 October 2026Last reviewed9 October 2026

Navigating court alone?

A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.

Find your support

Cookie Consent

We use essential cookies only to provide you with the best experience on our website. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.