This content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
People believe a report from an accountant they engaged will be weighed equally against the court-appointed single joint expert.
An expert who started as part of one side's team risks being influenced by that side, even without meaning to be. In LE v EL the judge preferred the single joint expert, partly because the other expert had relied on figures supplied through the husband that were not disclosed until shortly before the hearing.
Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.
The Gap?
"My own accountant's report carries the same weight as the single joint expert."
Court Reality
An expert who started as part of one side's team risks being influenced by that side, even without meaning to be. In LE v EL the judge preferred the single joint expert, partly because the other expert had relied on figures supplied through the husband that were not disclosed until shortly before the hearing.
Experienced a gap between what you thought you knew about family court and the reality? Share your own and get credited.
familycourtbridge.org
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.
Find your supportWe use essential cookies only to provide you with the best experience on our website. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.