Assumption: "Holding out for my own preferred contact centre, even without a clear reason, is reasonable caution."
1 min readThis content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
What People Expect
A parent may see holding out for their own preferred contact centre or arrangement, even without a clear reason, as reasonable caution rather than something that could count against them.
Court Reality
Insisting on a less practical option over a more sensible one, with no coherent explanation for the choice, can be read by the court as obstruction rather than legitimate caution, and can work against the parent making that choice.
Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.
The Gap?
"Holding out for my own preferred contact centre, even without a clear reason, is reasonable caution."
Court Reality
Insisting on a less practical option over a more sensible one, with no coherent explanation for the choice, can be read by the court as obstruction rather than legitimate caution, and can work against the parent making that choice.
Experienced a gap between what you thought you knew about family court and the reality? Share your own and get credited.
familycourtbridge.org
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.
Find your supportCookie Consent
We use essential cookies only to provide you with the best experience on our website. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.