This content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
A parent may believe that once they say they now accept findings of fact made against them, having previously denied them, the court and the other parent should simply take that change of position at face value.
A sudden reversal, particularly one that follows something like requesting a polygraph test, can be treated with real scepticism. The court can note that any objective observer would view such a change with caution, and may leave it to a structured programme, such as a domestic abuse perpetrator course, to actually test whether the change in thinking is genuine before contact is relaxed.
Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.
The Gap?
"If I initially deny the findings against me, then later say I've changed my mind and accept them, the court and the other parent have to take that at face value."
Court Reality
A sudden reversal, particularly one that follows something like requesting a polygraph test, can be treated with real scepticism. The court can note that any objective observer would view such a change with caution, and may leave it to a structured programme, such as a domestic abuse perpetrator course, to actually test whether the change in thinking is genuine before contact is relaxed.
Experienced a gap between what you thought you knew about family court and the reality? Share your own and get credited.
familycourtbridge.org
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.
Find your supportWe use essential cookies only to provide you with the best experience on our website. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.