This content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
Unmarried couples who buy a property jointly often assume that whoever put in more money, whether for the deposit or the mortgage, will get more back when the relationship ends.
Where a property is bought in joint names with no declaration of trust, the law presumes you own it equally, regardless of unequal financial contributions. That presumption is a high bar to overturn. It takes clear evidence of a different agreement, or of a shared intention that changed later, to get anything other than a 50/50 split.
This insight was contributed by someone who has been through the family court system. Bridge The Gap is deeply grateful to everyone who shares their experience — your honesty helps bridge the gap for the next person still in it.
Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.
The Gap?
"If we own the house jointly, whoever paid more of the deposit or mortgage gets a bigger share when we split up."
Court Reality
Where a property is bought in joint names with no declaration of trust, the law presumes you own it equally, regardless of unequal financial contributions. That presumption is a high bar to overturn. It takes clear evidence of a different agreement, or of a shared intention that changed later, to get anything other than a 50/50 split.
Experienced a gap between what you thought you knew about family court and the reality? Share your own and get credited.
familycourtbridge.org
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.
Find your supportWe use essential cookies only to provide you with the best experience on our website. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.