This content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
Parents sometimes believe that stopping contact unilaterally is a safe, cost-free response to a concern, and that they can explain their reasons later if challenged.
If there's a court order in place, stopping contact without applying to vary it risks being a breach. Without an order, unilaterally stopping contact can be viewed as unreasonably obstructing the other parent's relationship with the child, unless the risk genuinely justifies it. If safety is at risk, the answer is to apply to vary the order, not to stop and explain later.
This insight was contributed by someone who has been through the family court system. Bridge The Gap is deeply grateful to everyone who shares their experience — your honesty helps bridge the gap for the next person still in it.
Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.
The Gap?
"I can just stop contact if I'm worried, without any consequences."
Court Reality
If there's a court order in place, stopping contact without applying to vary it risks being a breach. Without an order, unilaterally stopping contact can be viewed as unreasonably obstructing the other parent's relationship with the child, unless the risk genuinely justifies it. If safety is at risk, the answer is to apply to vary the order, not to stop and explain later.
Experienced a gap between what you thought you knew about family court and the reality? Share your own and get credited.
familycourtbridge.org
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.
Find your supportWe use essential cookies only to provide you with the best experience on our website. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.