Assumption: "The court will only give me a share of my ex's business or shares as a last resort."
1 min readThis content reflects observational insights and lived community experiences. It does not constitute legal advice — always consult a qualified professional for your specific circumstances.
What People Expect
Wells sharing — where the court transfers a portion of illiquid assets like shares to the other spouse — is a rare last resort and only ever a small minority of the award.
Court Reality
The Court of Appeal has confirmed in Culligan v Rosemin-Culligan [2026] EWCA Civ 948 that Wells sharing is not a last resort and does not require a minority element. The objective is a fair balance of liquid and illiquid assets in all the circumstances. If one spouse has made assets illiquid without the other's knowledge, the court may share them more equally — not less.
Download the card and post it on Facebook, LinkedIn, or wherever you're active. Every share helps another litigant find this before their hearing.
The Gap?
"The court will only give me a share of my ex's business or shares as a last resort."
Court Reality
The Court of Appeal has confirmed in Culligan v Rosemin-Culligan [2026] EWCA Civ 948 that Wells sharing is not a last resort and does not require a minority element. The objective is a fair balance of liquid and illiquid assets in all the circumstances. If one spouse has made assets illiquid without the other's knowledge, the court may share them more equally — not less.
Experienced a gap between what you thought you knew about family court and the reality? Share your own and get credited.
familycourtbridge.org
Navigating court alone?
A McKenzie Friend can help you make sense of this in the context of your own case.
Find your supportCookie Consent
We use essential cookies only to provide you with the best experience on our website. No tracking or analytics cookies are used.